CVE List

Id CVE No. Status Description Phase Votes Comments Actions
4293  CVE-2001-1492  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-1460. Reason: This candidate is a refinement duplicate of CVE-2001-1460. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2001-1460 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20050621)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View
3971  CVE-2001-1167  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-0976. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2001-0976. Notes: CVE-2001-0976 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Proposed (20020315)  ACCEPT(3) Baker, Cole, Green | NOOP(4) Armstrong, Foat, Wall, Ziese | REJECT(2) Christey, Frech  Frech> DUPE:CVE-2001-0976 | References and descriptions overlap. Currently assigned to | XF:hp-prm-privilege-elevation(7050). | Christey> Agreed, it"s a dupe. CVE-2001-0976 will be preferred, since | it"s been public longer.  View
27406  CVE-2007-4049  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-1205. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-1205. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-1205 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20070730)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View
6919  CVE-2003-0090  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-0844. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-0844. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-0844 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20030211)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View
281  CVE-1999-0282  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1584, CVE-1999-1586. Reason: This candidate combined references from one issue with the description from another issue. Notes: Users should consult CVE-1999-1584 and CVE-1999-1586 to obtain the appropriate name. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Modified (20050830)  ACCEPT(2) Baker, Dik | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Ozancin | RECAST(1) Prosser | REJECT(1) Christey  Frech> XF:sun-loadmodule | XF:sun-modload (CERT CA-93.18 very old!) | Prosser> Believe the reference given, 95-12, is referencing a later | loadmodule(8) setuid problem in the X11/NeWS windowing system. There is an | earlier, similar setuid vulnerability in the CA-93.18, CIAC G-02 advisories | for the SunOS 4.1.x/Solbourne and OpenWindow 3.0. In fact, there may be the | same as the HP patches are 100448-02 for the 93 loadmodule/modload | vulnerability and 100448-03 for the 95 loadmodule vulnerability which | normally indicated a patch update. Looks like the original patch either | didn"t completely fix the problem or it resurfaced in X11 NeWS. Can"t tell | much beyond that and this is my opinion only as have no way to check it. | Which one is this CVE referencing? I accept both. | Dik> There are three similar Sun bug ids associated with the patches. | 1076118 loadmodule has a security vulnerability | 1148753 loadmodule has a security vulnerability | 1222192 loadmodule has a security vulnerability | as well as: | 1137491 | Ancient stuff. | Christey> Add period to the end of the description. | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from NOOP to REVIEWING] | Christey> This is distinct from CVE-1999-1584 - CVE-1999-1584 is for | CA-93.18. | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from REVIEWING to REJECT] | Christey> This candidate combines two separate issues. It uses the CERT | alert reference from 1995, from one issue, but a description that | is associated with a separate issue.  View

Page 20844 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 104216, ending on 104220

Actions