CVE List

Id CVE No. Status Description Phase Votes Comments Actions
5218  CVE-2002-0828  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0862. Reason: This is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Modified (20050204)  MODIFY(1) Foat | NOOP(3) Armstrong, Cole, Cox | REJECT(3) Baker, Christey, Frech | REVIEWING(1) Wall  Cox> Why isn"t this sharing the same CVE name as CVE-2002-0970? | Christey> BID:5410 | URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5410 | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from NOOP to REJECT] | Christey> This is an original report of a larger issue as described in | CVE-2002-0862. This candidate will be REJECTED and | CVE-2002-0862 will be used in its place, since CVE-2002-0862 | comes from a more authoritative source, and is more accurate. | Foat> This vulneraiblity is valid. It was discovered that the scope is much | greater than indicated in the description, since certificate checking is an OS | function in the Windows environment. A complete listing of the vulnerable | platforms is available at | http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bull | etin/ms02-050.asp. | Frech> Remains associated with XF:ssl-ca-certificate-spoofing(9776)  View
5231  CVE-2002-0841  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0842. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0842. The duplicate assignment was made before public disclosure. Notes: none.  Assigned (20020808)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View
5036  CVE-2002-0646  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0371. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0371. Notes: CVE-2002-0371 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20020628)  NOOP(1) Christey  Christey> DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE. | It is a "reservation duplicate" of CVE-2002-0371. CVE users | should use CVE-2002-0371 instead.  View
4584  CVE-2002-0192  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0193, CVE-2002-1564. Reason: This candidate was published with a description that identified a different vulnerability than what was identified in the original authoritative reference. Notes: Consult CVE-2002-0193 or CVE-2002-1564 to find the identifier for the proper issue.  Modified (20050204)  ACCEPT(5) Armstrong, Baker, Cole, Foat, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Cox | REJECT(1) Christey  Frech> XF:ie-content-disposition-variant(9085) | Christey> Hrmmm... the MS advisory says this is the "Script within | Cookies Reading Cookies" vulnerability... This description | was also used for CVE-2002-0193. | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from NOOP to REJECT] | Christey> This CAN had the wrong description added to it, which made | it look like a different vulnerability than the one identified | by Microsoft in MS:MS02-023. Therefore this CAN should be | REJECTed.  View
5618  CVE-2002-1234  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0180. Reason: This candidate is a an out-of-band assignment duplicate of CVE-2002-0180. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0180 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20021024)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View

Page 20843 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 104211, ending on 104215

Actions