CVE List
| Id | CVE No. | Status | Description | Phase | Votes | Comments | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5618 | CVE-2002-1234 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0180. Reason: This candidate is a an out-of-band assignment duplicate of CVE-2002-0180. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0180 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | Assigned (20021024) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
| 4584 | CVE-2002-0192 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0193, CVE-2002-1564. Reason: This candidate was published with a description that identified a different vulnerability than what was identified in the original authoritative reference. Notes: Consult CVE-2002-0193 or CVE-2002-1564 to find the identifier for the proper issue. | Modified (20050204) | ACCEPT(5) Armstrong, Baker, Cole, Foat, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Cox | REJECT(1) Christey | Frech> XF:ie-content-disposition-variant(9085) | Christey> Hrmmm... the MS advisory says this is the "Script within | Cookies Reading Cookies" vulnerability... This description | was also used for CVE-2002-0193. | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from NOOP to REJECT] | Christey> This CAN had the wrong description added to it, which made | it look like a different vulnerability than the one identified | by Microsoft in MS:MS02-023. Therefore this CAN should be | REJECTed. | View |
| 5036 | CVE-2002-0646 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0371. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0371. Notes: CVE-2002-0371 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | Assigned (20020628) | NOOP(1) Christey | Christey> DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE. | It is a "reservation duplicate" of CVE-2002-0371. CVE users | should use CVE-2002-0371 instead. | View |
| 5231 | CVE-2002-0841 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0842. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0842. The duplicate assignment was made before public disclosure. Notes: none. | Assigned (20020808) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
| 5218 | CVE-2002-0828 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0862. Reason: This is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | Modified (20050204) | MODIFY(1) Foat | NOOP(3) Armstrong, Cole, Cox | REJECT(3) Baker, Christey, Frech | REVIEWING(1) Wall | Cox> Why isn"t this sharing the same CVE name as CVE-2002-0970? | Christey> BID:5410 | URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5410 | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from NOOP to REJECT] | Christey> This is an original report of a larger issue as described in | CVE-2002-0862. This candidate will be REJECTED and | CVE-2002-0862 will be used in its place, since CVE-2002-0862 | comes from a more authoritative source, and is more accurate. | Foat> This vulneraiblity is valid. It was discovered that the scope is much | greater than indicated in the description, since certificate checking is an OS | function in the Windows environment. A complete listing of the vulnerable | platforms is available at | http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bull | etin/ms02-050.asp. | Frech> Remains associated with XF:ssl-ca-certificate-spoofing(9776) | View |
Page 101 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 501, ending on 505
