CVE List

Id CVE No. Status Description Phase Votes Comments Actions
281  CVE-1999-0282  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1584, CVE-1999-1586. Reason: This candidate combined references from one issue with the description from another issue. Notes: Users should consult CVE-1999-1584 and CVE-1999-1586 to obtain the appropriate name. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Modified (20050830)  ACCEPT(2) Baker, Dik | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Ozancin | RECAST(1) Prosser | REJECT(1) Christey  Frech> XF:sun-loadmodule | XF:sun-modload (CERT CA-93.18 very old!) | Prosser> Believe the reference given, 95-12, is referencing a later | loadmodule(8) setuid problem in the X11/NeWS windowing system. There is an | earlier, similar setuid vulnerability in the CA-93.18, CIAC G-02 advisories | for the SunOS 4.1.x/Solbourne and OpenWindow 3.0. In fact, there may be the | same as the HP patches are 100448-02 for the 93 loadmodule/modload | vulnerability and 100448-03 for the 95 loadmodule vulnerability which | normally indicated a patch update. Looks like the original patch either | didn"t completely fix the problem or it resurfaced in X11 NeWS. Can"t tell | much beyond that and this is my opinion only as have no way to check it. | Which one is this CVE referencing? I accept both. | Dik> There are three similar Sun bug ids associated with the patches. | 1076118 loadmodule has a security vulnerability | 1148753 loadmodule has a security vulnerability | 1222192 loadmodule has a security vulnerability | as well as: | 1137491 | Ancient stuff. | Christey> Add period to the end of the description. | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from NOOP to REVIEWING] | Christey> This is distinct from CVE-1999-1584 - CVE-1999-1584 is for | CA-93.18. | CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from REVIEWING to REJECT] | Christey> This candidate combines two separate issues. It uses the CERT | alert reference from 1995, from one issue, but a description that | is associated with a separate issue.  View
6919  CVE-2003-0090  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-0844. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-0844. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-0844 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20030211)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View
27406  CVE-2007-4049  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-1205. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-1205. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-1205 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20070730)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View
3971  CVE-2001-1167  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-0976. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2001-0976. Notes: CVE-2001-0976 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Proposed (20020315)  ACCEPT(3) Baker, Cole, Green | NOOP(4) Armstrong, Foat, Wall, Ziese | REJECT(2) Christey, Frech  Frech> DUPE:CVE-2001-0976 | References and descriptions overlap. Currently assigned to | XF:hp-prm-privilege-elevation(7050). | Christey> Agreed, it"s a dupe. CVE-2001-0976 will be preferred, since | it"s been public longer.  View
4293  CVE-2001-1492  Candidate  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-1460. Reason: This candidate is a refinement duplicate of CVE-2001-1460. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2001-1460 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.  Assigned (20050621)  None (candidate not yet proposed)    View

Page 100 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 496, ending on 500

Actions