NVD List

Id Name Description Reject CVSS Version CVSS Score Severity Pub Date Modified Date Actions
70908  CVE-2004-0472  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0434. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0434 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.        2016-12-20  2008-09-10  View
46762  CVE-2012-5661  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate that was detected before disclosure. Notes: None.        2017-01-19  2013-02-01  View
37801  CVE-2013-1622  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is not a security issue. Further investigation showed that, because of RFC noncompliance, no version or configuration of the product had the vulnerability previously associated with this ID. Notes: none.        2017-01-18  2013-02-13  View
6531  CVE-2008-6800  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not a security issue. It was originally created based on one vendor"s misinterpretation of an upstream changelog comment that referred to a race condition in the winbind daemon (aka winbindd) in Samba before 3.0.32. The upstream vendor states: "The Samba Team sees no way to exploit this race condition by a user of the system or an external attacker. In order to be able to trigger the race condition a privileged user (root) need to intentionally kill a winbind child process and carefully time the killing to trigger the race condition. Although, if the user is already privileged, it can more easily just kill the parent process directly." CVE concurs with the dispute. Notes: CVE users should not use this identifier.        2017-01-03  2009-05-27  View
75312  CVE-1999-0660  ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE. It might be more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A hacker utility, back door, or Trojan Horse is installed on a system, e.g. NetBus, Back Orifice, Rootkit, etc."        2017-01-05  2008-08-01  View

Page 257 of 17672, showing 5 records out of 88360 total, starting on record 1281, ending on 1285

Actions