NVD List
Id | Name | Description | Reject | CVSS Version | CVSS Score | Severity | Pub Date | Modified Date | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
64675 | CVE-2006-6114 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5854. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5854. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5854 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 1 | 2016-12-20 | 2008-09-10 | View | |||
68004 | CVE-2005-2303 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-1218. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-1218. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-1218 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 1 | 2017-01-03 | 2008-09-10 | View | |||
8356 | CVE-2011-1415 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1290. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-1290. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1290 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 1 | 2017-01-07 | 2011-03-17 | View | |||
82340 | CVE-2016-5798 | An issue was discovered in Fatek Automation PM Designer V3 Version 2.1.2.2, and Automation FV Designer Version 1.2.8.0. By sending additional valid packets, an attacker could trigger a stack-based buffer overflow and cause a crash. Also, a malicious attacker can trigger a remote buffer overflow on the Fatek Communication Server. | 2017-02-15 | 2017-02-14 | View | ||||
31652 | CVE-2014-3463 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a unique security issue. Notes: none. | 1 | 2017-01-19 | 2014-05-30 | View |
Page 17592 of 17672, showing 5 records out of 88360 total, starting on record 87956, ending on 87960