NVD List
| Id | Name | Description | Reject | CVSS Version | CVSS Score | Severity | Pub Date | Modified Date | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86925 | CVE-2017-4955 | An issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.65, 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.48, 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.28, and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.5. Several credentials were present in the logs for the Notifications errand in the PCF Elastic Runtime tile. | 2 | 5 | Medium | 2017-06-28 | 2017-06-23 | View | |
| 86929 | CVE-2017-4965 | An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | 2 | 4.3 | Medium | 2017-06-28 | 2017-06-23 | View | |
| 86930 | CVE-2017-4966 | An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | 2 | 2.1 | Low | 2017-06-28 | 2017-06-23 | View | |
| 86931 | CVE-2017-4967 | An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | 2 | 4.3 | Medium | 2017-06-28 | 2017-06-23 | View | |
| 86932 | CVE-2017-4970 | An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release v255 and Staticfile buildpack versions v1.4.0 - v1.4.3. A regression introduced in the Static file build pack causes the Staticfile.auth configuration to be ignored when the Static file file is not present in the application root. Applications containing a Staticfile.auth file but not a Static file had their basic auth turned off when an operator upgraded the Static file build pack in the foundation to one of the vulnerable versions. Note that Static file applications without a Static file are technically misconfigured, and will not successfully detect unless the Static file build pack is explicitly specified. | 2 | 4.3 | Medium | 2017-06-28 | 2017-06-26 | View |
Page 1404 of 17672, showing 5 records out of 88360 total, starting on record 7016, ending on 7020
