NVD List
| Id | Name | Description | Reject | CVSS Version | CVSS Score | Severity | Pub Date | Modified Date | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66700 | CVE-2005-0951 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: this candidate was created as a result of an analysis error for a researcher advisory for an issue that already existed. It stated an incorrect parameter, which was not part of the vulnerability at all. Notes: CVE users should not reference this candidate at all. | 1 | 2017-01-03 | 2008-09-10 | View | |||
| 83510 | CVE-2017-9999 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was used as an example and was not assigned for a security issue. Notes: none. | 1 | 2017-03-18 | 2017-03-16 | View | |||
| 57933 | CVE-2007-5908 | ** REJECT ** Buffer overflow in the (1) sysfs_show_available_clocksources and (2) sysfs_show_current_clocksources functions in Linux kernel 2.6.23 and earlier might allow local users to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted clock source names. NOTE: follow-on analysis by Linux developers states that "There is no way for unprivileged users (or really even the root user) to add new clocksources." | 1 | 2017-01-07 | 2008-09-10 | View | |||
| 66781 | CVE-2005-1032 | ** REJECT ** cart.php in LiteCommerce might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via invalid (1) category_id or (2) product_id parameters. NOTE: this issue was originally claimed to be due to SQL injection, but the original researcher is known to be frequently inaccurate with respect to bug type and severity. The vendor has disputed this issue, saying "These reports are credited to malicious person we refused to hire. We have not taken legal action against him only because he is located in India. The vulnerabilites reported can not be reproduced, hence information you provide is contrary to fact." Further investigation by CVE personnel shows that an invalid SQL syntax error could be generated, but it only reveals portions of underlying database structure, which is already available in documentation from the vendor, and it does not appear to lead to path disclosure. Therefore, this issue is not a vulnerability or an exposure, and it probably should be REJECTED. | 1 | 2017-01-03 | 2008-09-10 | View | |||
| 74857 | CVE-1999-0187 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0022. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0022. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0022 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 1 | 2017-01-05 | 2008-09-09 | View |
Page 100 of 17672, showing 5 records out of 88360 total, starting on record 496, ending on 500
