CVE List
| Id | CVE No. | Status | Description | Phase | Votes | Comments | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4095 | CVE-2001-1291 | Entry | The telnet server for 3Com hardware such as PS40 SuperStack II does not delay or disconnect remote attackers who provide an incorrect username or password, which makes it easier to break into the server via brute force password guessing. | View | |||
| 5119 | CVE-2002-0729 | Entry | Microsoft SQL Server 2000 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed 0x08 packet that is missing a colon separator. | View | |||
| 5375 | CVE-2002-0987 | Entry | X server (Xsco) in OpenUNIX 8.0.0 and UnixWare 7.1.1 does not drop privileges before calling programs such as xkbcomp using popen, which could allow local users to gain privileges. | View | |||
| 65536 | CVE-2013-5589 | Candidate | SQL injection vulnerability in cacti/host.php in Cacti 0.8.8b and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter. | Assigned (20130825) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
| 256 | CVE-1999-0257 | Candidate | Nestea variation of teardrop IP fragmentation denial of service. | Proposed (19990726) | ACCEPT(1) Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey | Frech> XF:nestea-linux-dos | Christey> Not sure how many separate "instances" of Teardrop | and its ilk. Also see comments on CVE-1999-0001. | | See: CVE-1999-0015, CVE-1999-0104, CVE-1999-0257, CVE-1999-0258 | | Is CVE-1999-0001 the same as CVE-1999-0052? That one is related | to nestea (CVE-1999-0257) and probably the one described in | BUGTRAQ:19981023 nestea v2 against freebsd 3.0-Release | The patch for nestea is in ip_input.c around line 750. | The patches for CVE-1999-0001 are in lines 388&446. So, | CVE-1999-0001 is different from CVE-1999-0257 and CVE-1999-0052. | The FreeBSD patch for CVE-1999-0052 is in line 750. | So, CVE-1999-0257 and CVE-1999-0052 may be the same, though | CVE-1999-0052 should be RECAST since this bug affects Linux | and other OSes besides FreeBSD. | | Also see BUGTRAQ:19990909 CISCO and nestea. | | Finally, note that there is no fundamental difference between | nestea and nestea2/nestea-v2; they are different ports that | exploit the same problem. | | The original nestea advisory is at | http://www.technotronic.com/rhino9/advisories/06.htm | but notice that the suggested fix is in line 375 of | ip_fragment.c, not ip_input.c. | Christey> See the SCO advisory at: | http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/advisory.html?id=1411 | which may further clarify the issue. | Christey> BUGTRAQ:19980501 nestea does other things | http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=90221101925819&w=2 | BUGTRAQ:19980508 nestea2 and HP Jet Direct cards. | URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=90221101925870&w=2 | BUGTRAQ:19981027 nestea v2 against freebsd 3.0-Release | URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=90951521507669&w=2 | | Nestea source code is in | MISC:http://oliver.efri.hr/~crv/security/bugs/Linux/ipfrag6.html | View |
Page 611 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 3051, ending on 3055
