CVE List
Id | CVE No. | Status | Description | Phase | Votes | Comments | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
92643 | CVE-2016-582384 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6277. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6277 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | Assigned (20161214) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
92435 | CVE-2016-5616 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6663. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-6663. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6663 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | Assigned (20160616) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
68409 | CVE-2014-10000 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references. | Assigned (20150113) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
72730 | CVE-2014-54321 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references. | Assigned (20150113) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
68410 | CVE-2014-100000 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references. | Assigned (20150113) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View |
Page 304 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 1516, ending on 1520