CVE List
Id | CVE No. | Status | Description | Phase | Votes | Comments | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
624 | CVE-1999-0642 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A POP service is running." | Modified (20080731) | ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | REJECT(1) Northcutt | View | |
641 | CVE-1999-0659 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A Windows NT Primary Domain Controller (PDC) or Backup Domain Controller (BDC) is present." | Modified (20080731) | REJECT(3) Baker, Northcutt, Wall | Wall> Don"t consider this a service or a problem. | Baker> concur with wall on this | View |
528 | CVE-1999-0531 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "An SMTP service supports EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and/or EHLO." | Modified (20080731) | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Christey | RECAST(1) Shostack | REJECT(1) Northcutt | Shostack> I think expn != vrfy, help, esmtp. | Frech> XF:lotus-domino-esmtp-bo(4499) (also assigned to CVE-2000-0452 and | CVE-2000-1046) | XF:smtp-expn(128) | XF:smtp-vrfy(130) | XF:smtp-helo-bo(886) | XF:smtp-vrfy-bo(887) | XF:smtp-expn-bo(888) | XF:slmail-vrfyexpn-overflow(1721) | XF:smtp-ehlo(323) | | Perhaps add RCPT? If so, add XF:smtp-rcpt(1928) | Christey> XF:smtp-vrfy(130) ? | View |
640 | CVE-1999-0658 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "DCOM is running." | Modified (20080731) | ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | REJECT(1) Northcutt | View | |
629 | CVE-1999-0647 | Candidate | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The bootparam (bootparamd) service is running." | Modified (20080731) | ACCEPT(2) Baker, Ozancin | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Wall | REJECT(1) Northcutt | Frech> XF:bootp | View |
Page 253 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 1261, ending on 1265