CVE List
| Id | CVE No. | Status | Description | Phase | Votes | Comments | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9492 | CVE-2004-1064 | Candidate | The safe mode checks in PHP 4.x to 4.3.9 and PHP 5.x to 5.0.2 truncate the file path before passing the data to the realpath function, which could allow attackers to bypass safe mode. NOTE: this issue was originally REJECTed by its CNA before publication, but that decision is in active dispute. This candidate may change significantly in the future as a result of further discussion. | Assigned (20041123) | REVIEWING(1) Christey | Christey> There is active disagreement regarding whether this satisfies the | criteria for inclusion in CVE, because the attack vectors require | function parameters that are typically controlled only by the | application developer, not an external attacker. This would mean that | only the PHP application owner could exploit it. | | Since various PHP functions already allow the application owner to | execute commands, no additional privileges would be gained by | exploiting such a bug. However, if safe_mode is enabled in PHP, then | the PHP functions related to execution are restricted | (e.g. shell_exec()). Thus, exploitation may allow the PHP application | owner to execute code *despite* the configured restrictions imposed by | safe mode, which then qualifies this as a vulnerability. | View |
| 9446 | CVE-2004-1018 | Candidate | Multiple integer handling errors in PHP before 4.3.10 allow attackers to bypass safe mode restrictions, cause a denial of service, or execute arbitrary code via (1) a negative offset value to the shmop_write function, (2) an "integer overflow/underflow" in the pack function, or (3) an "integer overflow/underflow" in the unpack function. NOTE: this issue was originally REJECTed by its CNA before publication, but that decision is in active dispute. This candidate may change significantly in the future as a result of further discussion. | Assigned (20041104) | REVIEWING(1) Christey | Christey> There is active disagreement regarding whether this satisfies the | criteria for inclusion in CVE, because the attack vectors require | function parameters that are typically controlled only by the | application developer, not an external attacker. This would mean that | the PHP application owner could exploit it | | Since various PHP functions already allow the application owner to | execute commands, no additional privileges would be gained by | exploiting such a bug. However, if safe_mode is enabled in PHP, then | the PHP functions related to execution are restricted | (e.g. shell_exec()). Thus, exploitation may allow the PHP application | owner to execute code *despite* the configured restrictions imposed by | safe mode, which then qualifies this as a vulnerability. | View |
| 3579 | CVE-2001-0772 | Candidate | Buffer overflows and other vulnerabilities in multiple Common Desktop Environment (CDE) modules in HP-UX 10.10 through 11.11 allow attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly gain additional privileges. | Modified (20090302) | ACCEPT(4) Baker, Cole, Foat, Frech | NOOP(2) Armstrong, Wall | REVIEWING(1) Christey | Christey> There is some overlap between CVE-2001-0551 and CVE-2001-0772. | CVE-2001-0551 describes a specific vulnerability in | dtprintinfo. HP acknowledges CVE-2001-0551 by stating | that the problem is fixed in HP:HPSBUX0105-151, which | is CVE-2001-0772. But CVE-2001-0772 is a vague advisory | that identifies other vulnerabilities (and vulnerability | types) besides CVE-2001-0551. Perhaps CVE-2001-0772 should | be RECAST to "remove" the reference to dtprintinfo and | leave the other vague descriptions. CVE-2001-0772 and | CVE-2001-0551 are very good examples of the problems that | CVE faces in being consistent with respect to the level of | abstraction, as documented in the CD:SF-CODEBASE, CD:SF-LOC, | and CD:VAGUE content decisions. | View |
| 3364 | CVE-2001-0551 | Candidate | Buffer overflow in CDE Print Viewer (dtprintinfo) allows local users to execute arbitrary code by copying text from the clipboard into the Help window. | Modified (20090302) | ACCEPT(2) Baker, Cole | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Foat, Wall | REVIEWING(2) Christey, Green | Christey> There is some overlap between CVE-2001-0551 and CVE-2001-0772. | CVE-2001-0551 describes a specific vulnerability in | dtprintinfo. HP acknowledges CVE-2001-0551 by stating | that the problem is fixed in HP:HPSBUX0105-151, which | is CVE-2001-0772. But CVE-2001-0772 is a vague advisory | that identifies other vulnerabilities (and vulnerability | types) besides CVE-2001-0551. Perhaps CVE-2001-0772 should | be RECAST to "remove" the reference to dtprintinfo and | leave the other vague descriptions. CVE-2001-0772 and | CVE-2001-0551 are very good examples of the problems that | CVE faces in being consistent with respect to the level of | abstraction, as documented in the CD:SF-CODEBASE, CD:SF-LOC, | and CD:VAGUE content decisions. | Baker> We should rewrite the candidate entry CVE-2001-0772 to address the other issues, and point the dtprintinfo issue to this entry. | Frech> XF:cde-dtprintinfo-bo(8034) | Christey> VULNWATCH:20020429 [VulnWatch] eSecurityOnline Security Advisory 2406 - CDE dtprintinfo Help sea rch buffer overflow vulnerability | URL:http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q2/0036.html | BID:4630 | URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4630 | Christey> CALDERA:CSSA-2002-SCO.30 | Christey> COMPAQ:SSRT2405 | URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/advisories/5997 | BID:8888 | URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8888 | View |
| 5146 | CVE-2002-0756 | Candidate | Cross-site scripting vulnerability in the authentication page for (1) Webmin 0.96 and (2) Usermin 0.90 allows remote attackers to insert script into an error page and possibly steal cookies. | Proposed (20020726) | ACCEPT(2) Armstrong, Cole | NOOP(4) Christey, Cox, Foat, Wall | Christey> This *might* be vendor acknowledgement: | URL:http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/12082/0/8595354/ | | However, the person who"s credited by the vendor found *TWO* | authentication-related vulnerabilities at about the same time, | and the vendor is clearly fixing "a" vulnerability. So, which | issue did the vendor fix? Which issue is the vendor | acknowledging - CVE-2002-0757 or CVE-2002-0756? | View |
Page 20659 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 103291, ending on 103295
