CVE List
| Id | CVE No. | Status | Description | Phase | Votes | Comments | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 253 | CVE-1999-0254 | Candidate | A hidden SNMP community string in HP OpenView allows remote attackers to modify MIB tables and obtain sensitive information. | Proposed (19990726) | ACCEPT(2) Baker, Frech | NOOP(1) Wall | REVIEWING(1) Christey | Christey> What is the proper level of abstraction to use here? Should | we have a separate entry for each different default community | string? See: | http://cve.mitre.org/Board_Sponsors/archives/msg00242.html and | http://cve.mitre.org/Board_Sponsors/archives/msg00250.html | http://cve.mitre.org/Board_Sponsors/archives/msg00251.html | | Until the associated content decisions have been approved | by the Editorial Board, this candidate cannot be accepted | for inclusion in CVE. | View |
| 65789 | CVE-2013-5842 | Candidate | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u40 and earlier, Java SE 6u60 and earlier, Java SE 5.0u51 and earlier, and Java SE Embedded 7u40 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5850. | Assigned (20130918) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
| 509 | CVE-1999-0512 | Candidate | A mail server is explicitly configured to allow SMTP mail relay, which allows abuse by spammers. | Modified (20020427-01) | ACCEPT(3) Baker, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Christey | Frech> XF:smtp-sendmail-relay(210) | XF:ntmail-relay(2257) | XF:exchange-relay(3107) (also assigned to CVE-1999-0682) | XF:smtp-relay-uucp(3470) | XF:sco-sendmail-spam(4342) | XF:sco-openserver-mmdf-spam(4343) | XF:lotus-domino-smtp-mail-relay(6591) | XF:win2k-smtp-mail-relay(6803) | XF:cobalt-poprelayd-mail-relay(6806) | | Candidate implicitly may refer to relaying settings enabled by default, or | the bypass/circumvention of relaying. Both interpretations were used in | assigning this candidate. | Christey> The intention of this candidate is to cover configurations in | which the admin has explicitly enabled relaying. Other cases | in which the application *intends* to prvent relaying, but | there is some specific input that bypasses/tricks it, count | as vulnerabilities (or exposures?) and as such would be | assigned different numbers. | | http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/spam.html seems like a good | general resource, as does ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2505.txt | Christey> I changed the description to make it more clear that the issue | is that of explicit configuration, as opposed to being the | result of a vulnerability. | View |
| 66045 | CVE-2013-6098 | Candidate | ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. | Assigned (20131011) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View | |
| 66301 | CVE-2013-6354 | Candidate | ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. | Assigned (20131103) | None (candidate not yet proposed) | View |
Page 20095 of 20943, showing 5 records out of 104715 total, starting on record 100471, ending on 100475
